Uranus Wave Pairs in the RealWorld

A review of how we map history against outer planet waves reveals that all of the outer waves must be considered as whole rather than separately. This observation holds particularly true with the Uranus-Pluto and Uranus-Neptune pairings. Quadrate alignments always correspond with noted turning points throughout history. Closer examination discovers that these turning points rarely happen in a flash, appearing over a year or two then disappearing. Instead, the change of historical victors develops over decades connecting unconnected elements together to shape new hisrorical direction.

<br />

Two examples emerge, one from the XIVth century and one from the XXth, both quite similar once understood. Uranus conjoined Pluto around 1455, then Neptune around 1478. This situation repeated in 1960s and 1990s: Uranus and Pluto aligned at 0 between 1963 and 1967; Uranus did the same with Neptune between 1989 and 1993. These event pairings also deserve mention for being the first two Uranus wave conjunctions of a new Neptune-Pluto wave, 1398 and 1892 respectively. This exercise demonstrates how to fully dissect history via outer planet measuremnent. It also closely mirrors how people and societies develop over time. Seldom does one factor determine the direction we follow through time. Outer planet measurement in general and Uranus wave measurement in particular reflects this reality.

<h2>1455Uranus-0-Pluto1596</h2>

<!---Title: A Shift of Tactics--->

Many important events occurred around the years that Uranus conjoined with Pluto in 1455. Ultimately, in many ways these events affected all of humanity. Two of these involved major players in European and World history: the end of the Hundred Years set the framework form which the French and English would build their nations; the Ottomans final assualt on Constantinople brought Roman empire to a complete end; a seemingly minor event had a major impact on all these parties and in fact spread to the entire planet: Gutenberg printed a bible by a very new means.

Fast forward to 1478 and we see all of these elements develop new life. The combination of printing press and the end of Byzantium increasingly brought Greek, Roman and Arab texts to a growing market. The fallout from the Hundred Years War was reaching an end as the War of the Roses too neared its end resulting in the emergence of the Tudors. This family would walk England into the modern world. In France, Charles the Bold would make the fatal mistakes that would forever keep the French possessing the Lowlands. All of these events relate to one another, but at the same time represent separate events.

Though the times proved more complex, the 1960s and 1990s share this type of relationship. The foundation of the digital revolution grew out of the integrated circuits and Arpanet. Equally, how people responded from Tienanmen Square to Berlin Wall grew roots grew from the social protests of the 1960s. Both major Communist governments, the USSR and China endured major change in direction in the late 1980s/early 1990s based on their actions during the 1960s portion of the Cold War with Chinese Cultural Revolution coming immediately to mind. Again, though these turning points operate separately from one another, how one time relates to the other easily proves true.

That the Internet, referring to its current state and influence, effectively altering how we see and pass information, and how we conduct business worldwide, is linked to the time around 1992-1993 we take as given. When we understand how fundamentally a change to our ways of life this shift to the historical vector proves, we will see how important it is to understanding history and our current place in it. This comprehension also leads to seeing how 1992-1993 easily compares to the time around 1478-1480.

The Internet covers much than the network that links millions of computers together. In fact what qualifies as a computer increasingly becomes less clear. What remains clear is that humans from all over quickly adapt to data networks when made available. From election campaigns, to banking, through retail and business management much has shifted to the Web. More importantly the shift proved so seamless that we wonder how we got along without it. But for all of its wonders it creates problems all its own: now that it is ubiquitous, everyone requires access to it. How do we produce enough electricity for everyone without further impacting the environment? What happens to e-waste? Interconnectedness has created new jobs and economic prosperity in China and India, but forces ruin to their environments and, in some cases, cultures to compete. The jobs created in Bangalore often mean job loss in Silicon Valley. The list of such consequence grows larger with each passing day. No matter how we feel, we cannot turn back. The way we conduct our lives has changed forever. This does not mean that we will forget the how to read books, but how and why we read books has been altered. Even the way they now reach publication differs from the past; the popular Harry Potter series began as a self-publication and helped put Amazon the map as an online bookseller. And no matter how you feel about Amazon, part of writing a book means dealing with that entity at least as far as research goes. The details here matter little. What does is the idea how big a shift we made from before 1992 than after. In matter of degree, Europeans took the same path starting in the 1480s.
We should know that Gutenberg chased demand. The spoken word, as evidenced by Cantebury Tales fed an ever growing demand for stories. Bards who told the tales had a constant market. At the same time few could read, yet write. Into these conditions Gutenberg introduced the perfection of the printing press. For the its time mass produced printing required a great deal of capital; [it should be known that Gutenberg spent a great deal of time in court protecting his invention from investors]. Those who ran the presses could not live on the Bible alone. The combination of demand and technology fueled the book boom that came after the 1480s; before then almost all publications were biblical in nature; after the amount of biblical text began to diminish. These conditions, along with Greek/Roman/Arab scholars transition around from Byzantium to the West led to a flood of works that fomented interests in ancient texts. In addition, the printing press fueled a parallel development: a move to the vernacular. At the time most business was conducted in Latin; diplomatic affairs in French. All of the local languages, though spoken, seldom appeared in print. This meant that few knew how to read in the vernacular. The presses, ever under pressure to make money--an idle press offered no return on investment--printed stories and brochures in the vernacular and fueled a literacy boom. Lutheranism's initial popularity derived partially from the the continuing distribution of Luther's demand in the German vernacular.

We begin to see a pattern emerge here. At the Uranus -Pluto conjunction a disruptive technology emerges that at first excites a limited circle. At the Uranus-Neptune conjunction the technology reaches a point of mass acceptance to the point of complete embodiment within a society. This occurred with movable type technology in the XVth century and again with the digital revolution of the late XXth. At the time of the first of these examples printing press replaced a tradition of writing religious texts by hand. Soon a reality set in among publishers that a larger audience would help increase profit. The twin opportunity of vernacularization and re-emerging ancient texts helped produce a market that soon created its own nneds and momentum.Much of this dynamic repeats during the digital revolution through which we live as of this writing. At first computers, made more practical with the integrated chip proved useful to a select few and maintained by the same. One of their developments came with a means to connect computers over a world-wide network. At or near the Uranus-Neptune conjunction of 1992 both of these developments merged into the World Wide Web where the newly emerged personal computer (PC) connected over the global network envisioned in the 1960s. That these events paralleled one another proves difficult to deny. That we are still in the midst in the digital revolution is the only reason we can not offer an exact match. Nonetheless, the similarities hold strong.

The next Uranus-Pluto/Uranus-Neptune conjunction pairings do not fall within a thirty year period. Instead the next pairings in the series fall at 1596 and 1649 and 2101 and 2165 respectively. How will do these differing spans compare? Since only the 1596-1649 sequence has already occurred we have only this time to examine.

We cannot speak of 1596 without referring to the printing press The shift to modernism revolves around the sun, like our solar system. Kepler perfected Copernicus and set the stage for Galileo. Modernism, with all of its implications, built its foundation on the theory of heliocentric motion. All of the theories only came about because they could now be printed and easily disseminated. Copernicus, who died in 1543 chose to wait until near his death to publish the work most connected with his name. The reason for the delay? He knew that his theory would both shake the foundations of all European knowledge and that the press would allow wide dispersion of his theory. Not only did his theory prove correct, so did his intuitions about it. The press helped spread the vernacular tongue and conversation in the vernacular meant an vastly wider audience in a growing variety of languages. Bear in mind too that not everyone had to read the book: summaries and pamphlets certainly spread the theory along with word of mouth. In the long run Copernicus and Kepler led to Descartes (born 1596) and Newtown. In the process they and their colleagues broke down the intellectual authority of the Church, diminished Plato and Aristotle and broke through to the scientific method. Imagine trying to accomplish all of the above without the help of the mass-printed word. Remember as well that the press had already removed another boundary to knowledge; no longer could the Church censure material by limiting what monks could print. The most important thing to know about the dawn of the XVIIth century is that publishing, connected to 1455 through 1455Uranus-0-Pluto1596, had reached critical mass. Literacy, at least among the elite, was a given. Books and other publications had an eager audience, one who's imagination could no longer be contained by the past. Kepler, Galileo and Shakespeare would have meant little if no one read them.

The span from 1596 from 1597Uranus-0-Pluto1710 to 1478Uranus-0-Neptune1649 represents the end of old world science, the one mixed with alchemy, astrologyhe divine and all the softer side of the discipline that modern science cannot tolerate. Of course it left us with a heliocentric solar system and new laws of motion. Even the most entrenched recognized that a new path had been uncovered. But the importance of the old finding the new should not be diminshed here. In our previous examples a disruptive view or technology finds its way into consciousness at the Uranus-Pluto conjunction , but makes limit impact until the next Uranus-Neptune conjunction. In the the 1596 - 1648 scenario, the disruption comes with Kepler's improvements over Copernicus, while the acceptance comes with the permission to explore anew with I think, therfore I am